Hard Forks and Soft Forks in Blockchains

Blockchain forks are a hot topic in the world of cryptocurrency and blockchain technology. However, the majority of software users are aware of the maintenance and upgrades that improve the efficiency of their apps.

Blockchain technology, too, is based on similar efficiency in terms of maintenance and upgrades. As a result, blockchain forks are a common occurrence in the cryptocurrency space.

While centralized service providers may readily add new features to their software with the click of a button, decentralized systems, such as cryptocurrencies on blockchains require a more involved method.

For instance, blockchains represent decentralized open-source protocols that operate without the intervention of a central authority.

Simply put, upgrading to the protocol requires the consensus of all network users. This distinct method of updating or upgrading a blockchain is referred to as a fork.

Blockchain forks are complex and difficult to understand, but they can be avoided if you know what one is. If not, this article will help clarify blockchain forks by discussing their definition, how they occur, and why people want them.

There’s no need to worry about all those confusing words like a hard fork or soft fork because soon you’ll have a clear understanding!

Blockchain Forks

While forks in blockchain are defined differently, the general notion is that they occur when a blockchain deviates into two or more possible paths forward.

Any crypto platform, including Bitcoin, can experience forks. When opposing parties reach an impasse, alternative chains arise from the chain. Although the majority of forks are transient, a few become permanent.

Short-lived forks occur due to the difficulties of obtaining consensus inside the system. As previously said, only network users are authorized to approve transactional modifications.

Forks can be classified as accidental or intentional.

Accidental forks occur when two or more blocks are discovered concurrently. They are resolved when additional blocks are added, resulting in one of the chains being longer than the other.

The shorter chain’s blocks are then abandoned by the blockchain network, described as orphaned blocks.

The second category of blocks, dubbed intentional forks, modifies the blockchain’s rules and includes two distinct kinds: hard forks and soft forks.

Forking is an important component of the blockchain, and it will continue to have a role in future developments. When forks occur, they can be disruptive for users who hold coins on exchanges or wallets that don’t handle forking well.

However, as long as you take precautions with your transactions before and after a fork happens, you should be able to manage any disruptions from these events just fine without too much difficulty.

Who Is Responsible for Fork Formation?

Since the blockchain is decentralized, it is up to the network’s participants to agree on a path ahead and execute improvements that improve the network’s overall efficiency.

Nevertheless, blockchains include a diverse range of players, from full node users, developers to miners.

Therefore, who has the last word on what network changes should be put in place?

Due to the unique contributions of each subgroup to the network, some members have greater voting power than others.

For instance, miners, who safeguard the network by allocating computational resources to block validation, tend to influence the security and popularity of fork versions.

Since miners supply computational resources required to operate the network, any fork version that the miners approve is likely to succeed.

The majority of open-source blockchains permit for role overlap and, as a result, shared responsibility for the fork generation process.

Other subset positions include developers, who design and update the code that runs on the blockchain, and full node users, who serve as the network’s backbone and auditors, validating and maintaining the blockchain’s history.

What is Hard Fork?

Forks are software protocol changes or upgrades to the blockchain that result in a split in the primary blockchain network.

If a cryptocurrency is currently running on an older blockchain, for instance, a fork of that blockchain will result in the formation of a second coin on the new, forked blockchain.

With a hard fork, the blockchain protocol’s rules are updated or altered in such a way that the old and new blockchains are incompatible.

This indicates that the old nodes will refuse to accept the recently updated blocks, and the new blockchain will run according to new rules that will continuously reject blocks from the old blockchain. This type of software upgrade is frequently referred to as “backward-incompatible.”

For instance, a hard fork was produced on the Bitcoin blockchain due to a debate among the Bitcoin community regarding the optimal strategy for network scaling.

Solely on a single side of the debate were members who desired a larger block size. But, on the other hand, some individuals were opposed to such developments.

Following that, individuals who desired a larger block size adopted the Bitcoin Cash fork, whereas those opposed to such modifications remained on the original Bitcoin network.

As a result, while the two coins (Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash) operate on distinct blockchains, they share a common history before the fork.

What is a Soft Fork?

Whereas a hard fork is an upgrade to the blockchain that is incompatible with previous versions, a soft fork is a modification to the rules that are forward compatible.

Since the fork is a backward-compatible upgrade, the old blockchain will keep accepting blocks from the recently updated blockchain protocol, even though the rules have changed due to the new software.

Simply said, a soft fork coerces the legacy blockchain into embracing the new rules, so accepting both the updated blocks and the legacy blocks of transactions concurrently.

Therefore, in contrast to a hard fork, a soft fork preserves the original blockchain by retaining two distinct lanes with distinct sets of rules.

A successful soft fork is the 2015 Segregated Witness (SegWit) Bitcoin protocol update.

Before the SegWit update, the Bitcoin protocol was more expensive (roughly $30 per transaction) and slower.

The SegWit update’s designers understood that signature data accounts for approximately 65% of a transactional block. As a result, SegWit advocated that the effective block size be increased from 1MB to 4MB.

The goal of this increase was to separate or eliminate signature data from transactional data on each block of the blockchain, so freeing up space for increased transactional throughput per block.

The obsolete Bitcoin blockchain was capable of accepting fresh 4MB and 1MB blocks concurrently through the use of a soft fork.

The soft fork enabled the old nodes to validate the new blocks, thanks to an ingenious engineering approach that formatted the new rules without violating the old ones.

Hard Fork vs. Soft Fork

Soft forks are the other sort of fork that evolved from intention forks.

Hard and soft forks are comparable in that when a blockchain rule is modified, the previous version of the rule stays on the network alongside the new one.

With soft forks, older nodes may accept data that seems to the new nodes to be invalid without the user realizing it. After the addition of new rules, nodes in hard forks will cease processing blocks.

Soft forks often maintain compatibility between the two versions of the software, but hard forks do not. While both forks result in a split, a hard fork leads to the creation of two blockchains, whereas a soft fork results in only one.

Due to the security disparities between hard and soft forks, the majority of users and developers prefer a hard fork over a soft fork.

While overhauling the entire blockchain requires considerable labor and computing resources, the privacy provided by a hard fork is a significant difference.

Codebase Fork

A codebase fork is a clone of a software implementation’s code. Generally, a codebase fork results in modifications to the original codebase.

In relation to Bitcoin, codebase forks could be completely compatible with the BTC protocol, they can result in an inadvertent blockchain fork, or they might result in the establishment of a completely new cryptocurrency.

Bitcoin has experienced many forks over its lifetime, but none have had any lasting implications for cryptocurrency users because they didn’t fundamentally alter Bitcoin’s core codebase.

Cryptocurrency investors and software developers constantly need to be aware of the implications of any codebase forks. Codebase forks can cause unintended and unwanted results, so it’s important to know how they work before making changes or updates.

Hard Fork vs. Soft Fork: Security

The blockchain and cryptocurrency communities dispute which kind of fork is the most appropriate for modernizing blockchain networks across the board.

Although each fork has its advantages, the disadvantages concern the communities and cause them to separate.

While soft forks are regarded as the kinder alternative, they do come with their own set of concerns.

The most serious of these threats is that adversaries can use a soft fork to dupe full-node users and miners into validating blocks that breach the blockchain’s rules.

Full-node users operate as the blockchain’s auditors, ensuring that a full copy of the blockchain is always available. It is their responsibility to ensure that each new block adheres to the rules of the previous blockchain.

When a group of people on the blockchain successfully creates new rules without the understanding of the network’s full node users, the network’s security could be jeopardized.

For instance, Bitcoin’s decentralized nature is preserved through the presence of full-node users and miners that operate independently of one another and verify the ledger’s validity.

This is how critical economic practices like avoiding double-spending and Bitcoin’s inflation mechanism are strengthened.

If adversaries dupe full-node users and miners into accepting blocks that break the rules, the blockchain may start validating invalid blocks, potentially resulting in the system’s downfall.

As a result, blockchains have attempted to limit this risk by publicizing all soft forks.

In contrast, hard forks have their own set of difficulties. To begin with, hard forks are notorious for severing communities. Compared to a soft fork, a hard fork has no middle ground.

Additionally, many crypto enthusiasts claim that hard forks are harmful because they divide the network’s hashing power, lowering the network’s overall security and processing capacity.

Forking the Truth about Forks

Although most forks are short-lived, they can create permanent changes. Therefore, when you’re investing in crypto or blockchain platforms, it is crucial to be aware of the potential for a fork and how this could affect your holdings.

Bottom Line
Pros
coinbase logo
Coinbase
Exchange
Learn More
Bottom Line
Great for beginners. Easy to use.
Pros
Simple to use even for beginners

Proven track record and a well-deserved reputation for security

Conduct transactions with PayPal
crypto.com logo
Crypto.com
Exchange
Learn More
Bottom Line
Great for mobile app users. Feature-packed.
Pros
Many features such as exchange, mobile app, and lending

Additional benefits for staking CRO

Several methods to generate cryptocurrency or interest

Forks also happen on other digital assets like Ethereum (ETH) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH). So consider researching any future investments into these sectors before making an investment decision based solely on price action.

Whichever sort of fork is used, it is evident that more work remains to be done to ensure a seamless progression of blockchain updates and upgrades.

Hard forks are preferred by the majority of blockchain miners and merchants because they eliminate the danger of validating or mining faulty blocks.

Hard forks assure that miners and merchants on the blockchain are not abandoned behind or swindled, particularly when they run.

On the other hand, hard forks use a large number of computing resources and are widely regarded as damaging to the sustainability of cryptocurrencies.

Notwithstanding their potential downsides, soft forks provide a significantly faster method for blockchain software upgrades without requiring an exorbitant amount of processing resources.

Additionally, soft forks are praised for their capability to deploy upgrades without dividing the community.

If you’re considering investing in cryptocurrencies but don’t know where to start, we have a guide outlining how to get started with cryptocurrency investments.

Certified Enterprise Blockchain Professional (CEBP)

Get a clear understanding of blockchain
Become an expert in the field and make more money
Be part of something bigger than yourself

Certified Enterprise Blockchain Architect (CEBA)

Learn blockchain architecture
Gain the skills you need to develop blockchain architecture
Become an expert and make a huge difference in your life and career

Certified Blockchain Security Expert (CBSE)

Become a blockchain security expert
Gain knowledge on the threats and vulnerabilities of blockchains
Protect your company’s data and intellectual property from hackers

Sunny Hoi

Sunny Hoi

Sunny is an experienced content strategist. He has a deep understanding of the retail and finance industries. Sunny has written extensively about products, services, stores, stocks, cryptocurrencies, and investment strategies. Sunny's writing reflects his deep understanding of his subjects and commitment to providing clear, concise information that helps readers make informed decisions.

Wealthy Magnate
Logo
Enable registration in settings - general